Why is that overkill? I thought the ultimate goal of MacPorts was binary packages. Binary packages won't need the *proto packages. I think we should not move these to lib deps.

Le 19 juin 09 à 19:44, Jeremy Huddleston a écrit :

They *were* build deps, but they were moved into lib deps. This is because too many ports need them to build, and adding build deps for all those X11 protocol headers in each port that needs them was overkill.


On Jun 19, 2009, at 08:14, Thomas De Contes wrote:


Le 19 juin 09 à 03:40, Perry Lee a écrit :

On Jun 19, 2009, at 9:34 AM, Thomas De Contes wrote:
thanks to port_cutleaves, i uninstalled all ports that i didn't need :-)

and today, doing "port -u upgrade outdated", it reinstalls them :-/

xorg-xtrans
xorg-bigreqsproto
xorg-xcmiscproto
xorg-xextproto
xorg-xf86bigfontproto
xorg-inputproto
xorg-kbproto
gperf


port_cutleaves still find them as "leaves"

I'd guess those are build dependencies rather than library dependencies.

ok,
so why uninstall them, since i'll need it later ?

--
Téléassistance / Télémaintenance
http://www.portparallele.com/ThomasDECONTES/

_______________________________________________
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users

_______________________________________________
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users

_______________________________________________
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users

Reply via email to