I'm curious about using Plone, which is currently at version 3.3. I've downloaded the "unified installer" from http://plone.org/products/plone and I'll take a look at the content of that package to see what the latest dependencies are (most likely they are satisfied by some MacPorts). However, it appears the zope port is outdated.
Is anyone else working on the Zope port? Is it a significant dependency of many other ports that are in wide use now? That is, what reason is there for the zope port to be "outdated", if any? Are there functional reasons, politics, superceded software, or what? Thanks, Darren On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 3:44 PM, MacPorts <[email protected]> wrote: > #20773: Add zope2.10 > > -----------------------------+---------------------------------------------- > Reporter: mar...@… | Owner: macports-tick...@… > Type: submission | Status: new > Priority: Normal | Milestone: > Component: ports | Version: 1.7.1 > Keywords: | Port: zope zope2.10 > > -----------------------------+---------------------------------------------- > As stated on the mailing list ( http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail > /macports-users/2009-February/013697.html ) I think there should be a port > for zope2.10 (and probably zope2.9, zope2.11). As with the different > Python versions it is a dependency for other applications like Plone. > > The attached port file is tested with MacPorts 1.710, Mac OS X 10.5, > Intel. > > -- > Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/20773> > MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> > Ports system for Mac OS > _______________________________________________ > macports-tickets mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-tickets >
_______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
