On 13.11.2009, at 16:42, joerg van den hoff wrote: > my question therefore is: if you've managed to get the commandline version > running would it not be possible > to provide this for the time being, for instance as a different port > 'unison-cli-only'? or is there another > way to get hold of it?
Well, in a way an unison-devel port would be appropriate, using the 2.32 sources. Maybe cli only, or with cli as a (non-default) variant. Why don’t you try to implement this, starting from a copy of the current unison port and come back with specific questions if this doesn’t work out? Greetings, Jochen -- Einigkeit und Recht und Freiheit http://www.Jochen-Kuepper.de Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité GnuPG key: CC1B0B4D Sex, drugs and rock-n-roll _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
