On Mar 20, 2010, at 16:22, Rainer Müller wrote:

On 2010-03-20 20:57 , Kok-Yong Tan wrote:
I'm encountering the following error to subversion after doing a "port -vd upgrade subversion". Is this a bug or something I've forgotten to
do before invoking "port -vd upgrade subversion"?  Here is the last
chunk of the output (please let me know if you need more):

Unfortunately, that's a bug with cyrus-sasl2:
http://trac.macports.org/ticket/17328

Workaround:
  sudo port deactivate cyrus-sasl2
  sudo port clean cyrus-sasl2
  sudo port upgrade cyrus-sasl2

Rainer

Many thanks for the reply. I did as you recommended and that got me over that obstacle. Then it happened again. This time, after also doing a deactivate, clean and install on subversion 1.6.5, I watched the build long enough to see it complain about my version of ruby being too outdated for subversion to use. When I scrolled back (thank goodness for sufficiently big scroll buffers) over the previous subversion build failure's output, I noticed that despite it also making the same complaint about ruby being too outdated for subversion 1.6.5 to use, the build had continued until it crapped out about an hour later instead of acknowledging the critical dependency on ruby versions and just stopping at that point so it would be obvious what the issue was. I discovered that if I manually built the latest version of ruby and then went back to do a deactivate, clean and install, subversion 1.6.5 built and installed without problems. FYI.
--
Reality Artisans, Inc.             #   Network Wrangling and Delousing
P.O. Box 565, Gracie Station       #   Apple Certified Consultant
New York, NY 10028-0019            #   Apple Consultants Network member
<http://www.realityartisans.com>   #   Apple Developer Connection member
(212) 369-4876 (Voice) # My PGP public key can be found at <https://keyserver.pgp.com>




_______________________________________________
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users

Reply via email to