On 2010-5-31 13:52 , Adam Mercer wrote: > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 22:32, Joshua Root <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Is there a way the registry could have got corrupted in some strange >>> way that would result port to think gcc44 wasn't installed? >> >> Maybe. Post the contents of the receipt. > > I've uploaded it to > <http://www.lsc-group.phys.uwm.edu/~ram/files/receipt.bz2>, as I'm not > sure what to look for. Is this the correct one for the sqlite > registry?
Well, that actually explains a lot. The receipt has 'epoch 2', while the current portfile is at epoch 1. No idea how it got there unless you used a modified portfile at some point, but in any case the epoch value would have been carried over into the sqlite registry. (You can check this by opening the registry.db with the sqlite3 tool and running the .dump command.) But the real question is now why 'port outdated' is *incorrectly* showing gcc44 as outdated. - Josh _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
