On Jun 16, 2010, at 19:31, Stephen Langer wrote: > Therefore it's a serious mistake for a packaging system to assume that it's > ok to enable openmp in libraries. A quick solution would be to provide both > openmp and no-openmp variants, which would make users choose between fast > stand-alone ImageMagick programs and libraries that can be linked by threaded > apps.
We don't need two variants; we only need one variant, "openmp", which the user can either enable or disable. It just remains a question as to whether the variant should be enabled by default or not. What I'm hearing is that we should disable it by default. > A better solution might be for the openmp and non-openmp versions of the > libraries to have different names, so that both could be installed on the > same system. Ugh. That sounds nasty. _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
