-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 9/3/10 04:27 , Scott Haneda wrote:
> How would files in /usr/local interfere with MacPorts as long as they are not 
> executable files?  And wouldn't /usr/local also further have to be in your 
> PATH?  A .h file, I can't see how that would have any impact on MacPorts 
> while it is building something, as MacPorts tried pretty hard to work in 
> prefix.   I would like to understand this better, but the ticket ( 
> https://trac.macports.org/ticket/12336 ) did not really help me get anywhere.

configure scripts have an annoying habit of looking for libraries and
include files under /usr/local no matter what you tell them to do.
Additionally, if /usr/local/bin is in $PATH and any *-config scripts are
installed there, configure will ask them for path information.  (That has
largely been superseded by pkg-config, but then you have configure adding
/usr/local to the search path for *that*.)

- -- 
brandon s. allbery     [linux,solaris,freebsd,perl]      [email protected]
system administrator  [openafs,heimdal,too many hats]  [email protected]
electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university      KF8NH
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkyBPXMACgkQIn7hlCsL25UfqwCgti/6bP3Yw60HB8xUWRYdFVox
g3wAnA5p3IzsLZ/vQMBeCYXtH2XjDxrg
=H/wb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
macports-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users

Reply via email to