On Oct 12, 2010, at 19:02, Takashi Yoshida wrote: > That's strange. I just tried `which clang` and it came back with > '/opt/local/bin/clang'. > I also tried running `port contents llvm` and it listed > '/opt/local/bin/clang' among other things as well. > > I had older clang installed from version 2.6_2 and 2.7_2 and recently > upgraded it to 2.8_0. > > Here's what I get when I run: > > `port installed | grep llvm` > > llvm @2.6_2 > llvm @2.7_2 > llvm @2.8_0+clang (active) > > Strange part is that older versions do not have any variants listed (+clang) > and when I upgraded to version 2.8, it appears like it picked up clang > variant (which is not listed if you run `port info llvm`) automatically. > > You can try installing the older version of llvm but you may also want to > hear from the maintainers first.
llvm @2.8_0 included a clang variant which was on by default. The variant and clang were removed from llvm in 2.8_1. You'll have to ask the maintainer what the plan is with that. _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
