On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 16:47, Daniel J. Luke <dl...@geeklair.net> wrote: > > My personal opinion is that we shouldn't bother with the 5.x ports. We should > have moved perl5 from 5.8 to 5.10 to 5.12 and just rev-bumped the p5 ports > when the changes were made ...
This sounds pretty sane. Are there any reports of any modules breaking within the 5 series? Is there any actual risk of breakage in moving from 5.8 to 5.10 to 5.12? Looking at the announcements, I don't see any potential issues, just additional features. Is there any reason to keep the older perl versions? -- arno s hautala /-| a...@alum.wpi.edu pgp b2c9d448 _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
