Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail:
> Von: "Keith J. Schultz" <[email protected]> > Datum: 11. März 2011 09:44:54 MEZ > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: Xcode 4 > > Hi All, > > Rumors are exactly, what they are rumors. > > 1) Xcode is not part of the OS and is not a required install > to make OSX works! > > 2) There are third party compilers that work for OSX! > > So anti-trust is not an issue! > > There are many scenarios that can be constructed! > > If we look at what Apple has been doing in the past: > 1) Xcode was always distributed with the OS > 2) drastically reduced the price of being a developer. > 3) Introduced the Mac App store > 4) Distributed the developer release of Lion through the Mac > App store > 5) released Xcode 4 through the Mac App Store > > Now add into the picture that both Xcode 4 and Lion are huge downloads > and you get a simple evolution towards the Mac App store as their > primary > distribution channel!! > > Not much to guess at! > > regards > Keith. > > Am 10.03.2011 um 20:04 schrieb Gregory Seidman: > >> >> Rumor has it that it is a regulatory issue. If Apple bundles too much >> software with the OS or machine or something they open themselves up to >> antitrust issues. I'm sort of surprised they don't have just the Mac SDK >> stuff (compiler and frameworks/headers) in a simple to install free >> package, though. I can see Xcode falling under such things, but not the >> basic toolchain. Perhaps it will show up as a release in the open source >> darwin project. >> >
_______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
