Developers with access to Lion seeds should install from source. A dmg for Lion will be made available after Lion is released.
- Josh On 2011-7-19, Dominik Reichardt wrote: > Hi, > > What is recommended for Lion? I'm switched through the developer program and > the previously installed ports work fine but "port upgrade outdated" doesn't > work fine. Didn't expect it to, I know I need to rebuild anyway. Just thought > I'd wait for MacPorts 2.0, especially since there isn't a designated Lion > download. > So is it recommended to switch via the SL build of MacPorts 2.0 rc1 or wait a > bit longer (which isn't a problem right now)? > > Take care > > Dom > > >> Source code and disk images for MacPorts 2.0.0-rc1 are now >> available [1]. Testing of either of these install methods is helpful. >> >> While there are no known regressions from 1.9.2 at this point, be >> prepared to encounter bugs. As always, having a recent backup would be >> wise. Please report any bugs that you find [2] (after first searching >> Trac [3], of course!) >> >> If no showstopping bugs are found in the next few days, this will become >> the 2.0.0 release. >> >> There are a large number of changes in this release. See the ChangeLog >> [4] for a list of most of them. You may like to focus your testing on >> the new features in that list, as well as your normal usage. >> >> Notable changes since beta3 are: >> * The installer's check for the existence of the 'macports' group now >> works correctly on 10.5. (#30096) >> * It's again possible to clean just the directories in ~/.macports by >> running 'port clean' without privileges. >> * A few issues with fetching archives have been fixed. > _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
