I can't believe I just sent that on the individual accidentally LOL. Anyway I suppose the true ideal would be a "reply-cc-to" field, so that it's obvious to everybody where their messages are going, and the default is also to go back to the list. But alas. Cheers! -roger-
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Roger Pack <rogerdpa...@gmail.com> Date: Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:56 AM Subject: Re: Request: make the ML's default return candidate be the ML To: Ryan Schmidt <ryandes...@macports.org> > Sorry, we're not going to modify the Reply-To, From or other headers the user > sets. Doing so is contrary to Internet standards. See: > > http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html it states: "•Munging can catch people by surprise, since in every other email they've gotten with multiple recipients, when they hit "reply" it goes only to the sender." This no longer seems to be the case, as, in every other email they've (now) gotten from multiple recipients (mailing lists these days, including all the sourceforge ML's, google groups, etc.), hitting reply goes to the ML, not the original sender. Which is why I would say non munging catches people by surprise, so the doc is out of date (from my perspective). But I respect your right to stick to it, if you see that correct. Cheers. =r _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
