-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256




Ryan Schmidt <[email protected]> schrieb:

>might be wondering as well, so I'm Cc'ing the mailing list) what made
>you decide to run MacPorts on Linux. First, I was surprised you
>succeeded in installing MacPorts on Linux at all; I thought that had
>broken. But more than that, as you're discovering, a lot of ports and
>portgroups are written on the assumption that they are running on OS X,
>or at least Darwin. It will probably take significant effort to remove
>that assumption, and I'm not convinced it's worth the effort, since
>MacPorts is, as suggested by its name, made to run on Mac OS X, not on
>Linux or FreeBSD or other systems. Are none of the existing standard
>ways of getting software onto a Linux system suitable?

This would be nice to hear here - i.e. why do you did not used port systems 
like pkgsrc or Gentoo portage which officially provide linux environments?

But another point here may be - why MacPorts (which is by principe developed 
and maintained for Mac OS X only) afaik did not cooperate nor participate on 
well driven / maintained ports projects like pkgsrc?

As far as i understand pkgsrc still targets an open list of unixoide / posix 
operating systems like Linux and BSDs (and afaik even proprietary operating 
systems) on different hardware platforms. These realizes a potentially large 
users and developers audience with different operating systems, but at the time 
no Mac OS X.

How can MacPorts participate on pkgsrc in the future and how far could that 
make any sense? From what i understand directly participating directly on 
pkgsrc could further merge users into larger audiences?

Maintaining ports for pkgsrc and macports currently are two completely 
different things and maintaining ports is a huge, ressource consuming job at 
all. Afaik MacPorts in parts hold ports only available / make sense on Mac OS 
X, but most ports are even available on other platforms.

So, does it make sense to i.e. extend pkgsrc towards Mac OS X or making 
macports in any way more compatible to pkgsrc ports or cooperate with pkgsrc 
stronger in any other way?

Pls don't flame if im completely on a wrong way here - i just try to understand 
the situation.


cheers,


Niels.

- --
Niels Dettenbach
Syndicat IT&Internet
http://www.syndicat.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: APG v1.0.8

iIEEAREIAEEFAk7sVlQ6HE5pZWxzIERldHRlbmJhY2ggKFN5bmRpY2F0IElUJklu
dGVybmV0KSA8bmRAc3luZGljYXQuY29tPgAKCRBU3ERlZRyiDTlkAJ9X9FQSVFrq
HayUFYVHAQ0BUOvgCQCfZc3RrFZlgL8NY0wAR5q4I6ufFUw=
=UrVr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
macports-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users

Reply via email to