Wouldn't perl need to be installed as "perl5 +perl5_14" not "perl5 @5.14.1_2"?
The default is activated by the variant given to the perl5 pseudo port. I think you'd only be able to run "perl5 @" if the specified version had already been built, but was inactive. On 2012-01-05, Ryan Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jan 5, 2012, at 12:52, Rodolfo Aramayo wrote: > >> Thanks but the problem is that the port: >> >> perl5 @5.12.3_1+perl5_12 (active) >> >> was installed by another port not by me...I requested: >> perl5.14 @5.14.1_2 > > No problem. Multiple perls can happily coexist. > > >> So I did what you guys suggested and issued the command: >> >> port install perl5 perl5.14 @5.14.1_2+threads >> >> but the "perl --version" port still is: "This is perl 5, version 12, >> subversion 3 (v5.12.3) built for darwin-multi-2level" > > That should not be. /opt/local/bin/perl should now be a simlink to perl5.14. > What does "ls -l /opt/local/bin/perl" and "port installed perl5" show? What > does "which perl" show? > > >> Should I uninstall ALL perls before issuing the command: >> >> port install perl5 perl5.14 @5.14.1_2+threads?? > > No. > > > _______________________________________________ > macports-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users > -- arno s hautala /-| [email protected] pgp b2c9d448 _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
