On Jan 21, 2012, at 17:50, Dominik Reichardt wrote:
> Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On Jan 21, 2012, at 13:58, Dominik Reichardt wrote:
>>
>>> Don't all the dependants on libSDL need a version bump too? Especially the
>>> SDL satellite libs libSDL_net, libSDL_ttf, libSDL_mixer, etc...
>>
>> Why do you think they do? Did the library version change?
>
> Yes libSDL was updated to 1.2.15 from 1.2.14 yesterday (a much wanted release
> as it fixes fullscreen for SDL apps on Lion). I *think* the dependants need
> an update too but I'm not 100% sure whether that's really needed. That's why
> I asked ;)
Right, that's a minor version update. If the libsdl developers are following
sensible version numbering practices, 1.2.15 should be fully
backward-compatible with 1.2.14. Let's have a look:
$ port -q installed libsdl
libsdl @1.2.14_9+universal+x11 (active)
$ otool -L /opt/local/lib/libSDL.dylib | head -n 2
/opt/local/lib/libSDL.dylib:
/opt/local/lib/libSDL-1.2.0.dylib (compatibility version 12.0.0,
current version 12.3.0)
$ sudo port -u upgrade libsdl
[snip]
$ port -q installed libsdl
libsdl @1.2.15_0+universal+x11 (active)
$ otool -L /opt/local/lib/libSDL.dylib | head -n 2
/opt/local/lib/libSDL.dylib:
/opt/local/lib/libSDL-1.2.0.dylib (compatibility version 12.0.0,
current version 12.4.0)
As you see, the compatibility version is the same, so no revbump is needed.
Now, if libsdl had been updated to 1.3, the library version probably would have
changed, since 1.3 has been in development forever and we already know it's
drastically different from the 1.2 series, so that would indeed have required a
revbump of all ports using it.
_______________________________________________
macports-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
