> On 24 March 2012 18:26, bunk3m <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not a lawyer but I'd say it is FOSS. > > Neither am I, and I'd say it isn't. > > Pertinently, the lawyers employed by Red Hat (among others) agree with me, > not with you. See, for instance, > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/distributions/2008-October/000276.htmland > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ForbiddenItems#TrueCrypt and > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/distributions/2008-October/000273.html .
If it's not on OSI I'd say it's more likely not FOSS. http://www.opensource.org/licenses/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
