Wait, what? Isn't the default (at least for recent versions) to install 
binaries if available and compile otherwise?

vq
Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 3, 2012, at 7:38 PM, Gregory Seidman 
<[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 07:09:17PM -0400, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
>> That's how it just works.
> 
> Well, no, it doesn't just work. I want to issue a single port command, e.g.
> port upgrade outdated, and have it install binaries where available and
> install anything else from source. I want to *prefer* binaries without
> *restricting* to binaries.
> 
> --Greg
> 
>> Gregory Seidman <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 11:12:55AM -0400, Arno Hautala wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Jeremy Lavergne
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> yes, but that would only work if a binary is available!
>>>>> 
>>>>> Yes, but it'll do what you're after: letting you know if one is
>>> available.
>>>>> 
>>>>> You can add -p if you want it go on and do what it can from a list
>>> of
>>>>> ports you want to install without bailing at first error.
>>>> 
>>>> Good idea, so say you want to install some set of ports, one of which
>>>> has many deps:
>>>> 
>>>>> port -p -b install port1 port2 port3 big-port
>>>> 
>>>> port1 port2 go in fine, port3 isn't available as a binary and one of
>>>> the deps of big-port isn't available.
>>>> 
>>>> You can then check what's missing with:
>>>> 
>>>>> port echo port1 port2 port3 big-port rdepof:big-port and not
>>> installed
>>>> 
>>>> You would see something like:
>>>> 
>>>>> port3
>>>>> big-port
>>>>> big-port-dep1
>>>> 
>>>> You can then install the ports that you have to manually compile when
>>>> you have the processor time:
>>>> 
>>>>> port install port3 big-port
>>> 
>>> Is there any way to automate this? I'd really like to pass some
>>> argument to
>>> port to prioritize installing binaries, but still install packages from
>>> source when they aren't available as binaries.
>>> 
>>>> arno  s  hautala    /-|   [email protected]
>>> --Greg
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> macports-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
>> 
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> macports-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
_______________________________________________
macports-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users

Reply via email to