On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Robert P. Goldman <rpgold...@sift.info>wrote:
> That fasl (fast load) file is not the problem. It is recompiled as part of > the testing process, so if it still references the stale libffi, then the > ECL compiler is still referencing it, despite the port upgrade. So the port > upgrade is not sufficient to fix the problem. I don't know enough about the > mechanics to understand why the command Brandon supplied did not trigger a > rebuilding of the ECL compiler, but it didn't. > Or it did but that wasn't enough. It occurs to me that, if it's generating FASLs as shared objects, it may have a hardcoded reference somewhere in the source code (a string, not a linker reference that would be updated automatically) and a patch would be needed to update that. -- brandon s allbery allber...@gmail.com wandering unix systems administrator (available) (412) 475-9364 vm/sms
_______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
