On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Peter wrote: >>> >>>> May I please ask you for the output of "port -v configure gnuplot <any >>>> variants>" to see what it reports for these two lines in particular: >> >>>> checking for stdbool.h that conforms to C99... yes >>>> checking for _Bool... yes >> >> I run the following command to compile Gnuplot. >> >> sudo /opt/local/bin/port install cairo +no_x11 +quartz +universal >> sudo /opt/local/bin/port install pango +no_x11 +quartz +universal >> ./configure CPPFLAGS='-arch i386' LDFLAGS='-arch i386' >> --with-readline=builtin --prefix=$HOME/gnuplot-4.6_bin --without-lisp-files > > I was missing the fact that you compiled for i386 only (it was > implicit, I just didn't think about it). However that should not > really change anything. > >> Here is the result. >> >> checking for stdbool.h that conforms to C99... no >> checking for _Bool... yes
Sadly I'm unable to test & reproduce anything here. I have Xcode 3.2.5 on 10.6 and that one returns: checking for stdbool.h that conforms to C99... yes checking for _Bool... yes (I'm not sure if I want to install the old Xcode over the new one on that machine.) My only remaining question is whether _Bool is defined in C and not in C++ (this would explain the behaviour) or if it is something completely different. Mojca _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
