On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Ryan Schmidt <ryandes...@macports.org> wrote:
>> There are lots of things that Macports COULD theoretically do, but
>> given the available resources it basically only works in "one way."
>> That means that there is one available version of every port, and
>
> This is not always the case. There are multiple ports for php (php53, php54, 
> php55, plus the legacy ones), python (python24, python25, python26, python27, 
> python31, python32, python33), perl (perl5.8, perl5.10, perl5.12, perl5.14, 
> perl5.16), etc. In the case of php and python this seems to work very well. 
> Users can choose the version they want, ports can declare dependencies on the 
> version they want, multiple versions can be installed at the same time. perl 
> is supposed to work that way too, but there has been recent discussion about 
> it not being worth the hassle and about undoing all of this and going back to 
> just a single version of perl. So certainly before we invest energy in 
> splitting tcl and tk into multiple versioned ports we should be sure that we 
> really need that.
>

Right, of course, what I was trying to say was that each PORT has only
one version.  So, in my world anyway, python25 and python26 are
different ports.  We're into semantics at this point!

Scott
_______________________________________________
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

Reply via email to