On Feb 26, 2013, at 3:41 PM, Jan Stary <[email protected]> wrote: > If you reply to a message to this list on this list > (as opposed to off-list), please reply To: the list.
meh This is people doing 'reply-all' since few graphical MUAs do 'List-Reply' > Increasingly often, I see people replying To: the original > poster, with Cc: to the list. Such a message does reach > the recipients, but > > (1) it breaks the list functionality: > none of the List-* headers is present in the message. > Many people, me included, filter by sych headers. It doesn't break anything. The message as delivered by the mailing list still contains the list headers. > (2) it is redundant - the original poster > is subscribed to the list. yep, but for some workflows this is better/intended (ie, if you filter list traffic to a list-specific mailbox, you can get instant notification in your 'main' INBOX when someone replies to a thread you are participating in). It's also not too difficult to set up procmail to munge this behavior into whatever you want to have happen... -- Daniel J. Luke +========================================================+ | *---------------- [email protected] ----------------* | | *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* | +========================================================+ | Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily | | reflect the opinions of my employer. | +========================================================+ _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
