On Apr 5, 2013, at 6:56 AM, Ryan Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Apr 5, 2013, at 01:25, Eneko Gotzon Ares wrote:
>> in order to keep upgrading and rebuilding, I suppose that to deactivate the 
>> faulty one will not cause damage.
> 
> If you're saying that you're running "sudo port upgrade outdated", and it's 
> failing at FileZilla, and there are other outdated ports that you would like 
> to rebuild that have nothing to do with FileZilla, then you don't need to 
> deactivate FileZilla to do that; you can just run "port outdated" to see the 
> list of outdated ports, and then upgrade individual ports explicitly by name, 
> i.e. "sudo port upgrade glib2" or whatever.


I think you can also do something like 'sudo port upgrade outdated and not 
badport'

--
Daniel J. Luke                                                                  
 
+========================================================+                      
  
| *---------------- [email protected] ----------------* |                      
    
| *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* |                      
    
+========================================================+                      
  
|   Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily   |                      
    
|          reflect the opinions of my employer.          |                      
    
+========================================================+



_______________________________________________
macports-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

Reply via email to