Okay, did the sudo port -d sync again to get a verbose output, and it
updated quite a few items.

Here is the last of it:

Total number of ports parsed:  8179
Ports successfully parsed:     8179
Ports failed:                     0
Up-to-date ports skipped:      8927



The list is quite long on what was looked at and updated and added.  To my
eye, I cannot see anything wrong, so tried again with just:

Sudo port sync

And this time it just had:  updating ports tree

And went back to the prompt, no errors!!  Am wondering if doing this in
verbose mode forced it to add the items it needed?

Any thoughts?


Thanks,


Lisa




-- 
Lisa Madden, ACA
Sr. Systems Administrator
ADNET Systems, Inc. (SESDA 3 Contract)
Terrestrial Information Systems Laboratory (619)
Building 33, Room H-108

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
301.614.6594






On 5/24/13 9:18 PM, "Bradley Giesbrecht" <[email protected]> wrote:

>On May 24, 2013, at 12:42 PM, Madden, Lisa E. (GSFC-619.0)[ADNET SYSTEMS
>INC] wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Newbie to Macports so excuse if this is a dumb questionÅ .
>> 
>> We cannot use rsync so am updating using svn.  Anyway, I type port
>>sync, and it comes back with this "error:"
>> 
>> Synchronization of the local ports tree failed doing an svn update
>> Port sync failed: synchronization of 1 source(s) failed
>> 
>> 
>> WHAT does this mean and how do I find out which source failed?
>
>I'm not sure.
>
>Make port more verbose and see if you get any clues.
>
>$ sudo port -d sync
>
>
>
>Regards,
>Bradley Giesbrecht (pixilla)
>

_______________________________________________
macports-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

Reply via email to