Okay, did the sudo port -d sync again to get a verbose output, and it updated quite a few items.
Here is the last of it: Total number of ports parsed: 8179 Ports successfully parsed: 8179 Ports failed: 0 Up-to-date ports skipped: 8927 The list is quite long on what was looked at and updated and added. To my eye, I cannot see anything wrong, so tried again with just: Sudo port sync And this time it just had: updating ports tree And went back to the prompt, no errors!! Am wondering if doing this in verbose mode forced it to add the items it needed? Any thoughts? Thanks, Lisa -- Lisa Madden, ACA Sr. Systems Administrator ADNET Systems, Inc. (SESDA 3 Contract) Terrestrial Information Systems Laboratory (619) Building 33, Room H-108 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center 301.614.6594 On 5/24/13 9:18 PM, "Bradley Giesbrecht" <[email protected]> wrote: >On May 24, 2013, at 12:42 PM, Madden, Lisa E. (GSFC-619.0)[ADNET SYSTEMS >INC] wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Newbie to Macports so excuse if this is a dumb questionÅ . >> >> We cannot use rsync so am updating using svn. Anyway, I type port >>sync, and it comes back with this "error:" >> >> Synchronization of the local ports tree failed doing an svn update >> Port sync failed: synchronization of 1 source(s) failed >> >> >> WHAT does this mean and how do I find out which source failed? > >I'm not sure. > >Make port more verbose and see if you get any clues. > >$ sudo port -d sync > > > >Regards, >Bradley Giesbrecht (pixilla) > _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
