On Jun 21, 2013, at 2:30 AM, Ryan Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Jun 20, 2013, at 07:41, Hans Ekkehard Plesser wrote:
> 
>> Everything would be solved if I could download MacPorts, configure it to 
>> use, e.g., MacPorts gcc 4.7 to build everything, and then install all the 
>> ports I need for NEST
> 
> You can configure MacPorts to do that. There is a setting in macports.conf 
> you can set too override its usual default compiler choice. (Individual ports 
> might still override that, for reasons specific to those ports.) I forget 
> what the option is called and it is not documented or advertised

As of the latest trunk (r107199), the option is called "default_compilers". If 
set, its value becomes the default value for compiler.fallback.

>> I much appreciate MacPorts philosophy of making itself maximally independent 
>> from tools shipped with OSX.

This is not quite accurate. MacPorts strives to be as independent as possible 
from the *libraries* that Apple ships. Ports can and do use Apple-shipped 
executables (e.g., make, sed, grep) all the time.

>> Therefore, I have never quite understood why MacPorts insists on using the 
>> system compiler. I very well understand that it is virtually impossible to 
>> support a range of compilers, but why not use MacPorts own GCC as default 
>> then? As most of the packages provided through MacPorts originate from the 
>> Unix/Linux-world, I'd expect them to be GCC-friendly.
>> 
>> I'd much appreciate some information on why MacPorts has made the choices it 
>> has made and whether there are any plans for change.
> 
> FSF GCC did not used to support -arch flags, which MacPorts uses to give the 
> user the choice of architecture(s) to compile for. My understanding is that 
> gcc47 finally supports -arch flags so this is no longer a problem.

This is true, but only for single-architecture builds. FSF GCC still cannot 
create universal binaries, so switching configure.compiler to macports-gcc* or 
macports-dragonegg* instantly breaks universal builds for every port that 
doesn't use the muniversal PortGroup (and possibly some that do).

vq
_______________________________________________
macports-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

Reply via email to