> The only reservation I have is inexperience with lbzip2, and at least one > comparison I saw cited high memory requirements and out of memory crashes > with lbzip2. I will have to find the page when I'm back at a computer, and it > may very well have been addressed by now.
That applies to anything, until you use it for the first time ;) But yes, if it has issues like these you describe, we should test it. I would bet though that if it did have such problems, they would be fixed pretty sharpish ... > > Not being updated in a while is not a bad sign for a tool you just want to > work. Apologies, I wasn’t intending to imply it was better maintained than pbzip2, just to seems to have good support of its own upstream. The fact Fedora plans to switch to it is also I think a good sign. > > The unzipping anything in parallel, however, is a distinct advantage, and > makes it worth examining. I think, if true, it would be a killer point, as it would mean we would benefit automatically, with existing archives. > > - Eric
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
