Hello, 

I had a quick look at the Portfile, and apart some small things which could be 
simplified, it seems fine to me. One thing missing though are the maintainers. 
Should I put you, René, as you proposed it, or should I take it as an 
additional dependency of KDE, or put both ? In case I take it, I would be 
tempted to put things in the same format as other KDE ports for convenience. 

Kdepim4-runtime will anyway be revbumped if the dependency is added, but on a 
side note, it should not provide built binaries due to license conflicts. 

Cheers, 

Nicolas


On Jun4, 2014, at 0:51, Marko Käning <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi René,
> 
> I’ll have a look at it within the next few days, but I could imagine that 
> Nicolas might be faster than me, since he’d want to add it himself to 
> kdepim4-runtime as a dependency.
> 
> Greets,
> Marko

_______________________________________________
macports-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

Reply via email to