On Jun 13, 2014, at 3:23 AM, René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thursday June 12 2014 22:13:34 Jason Mitchell wrote: >> Hello, >> >> For projects with several forks, i.e. more than stable and devel, what >> is the preferred Portfile treatment? Consider git-flow, which uses the >> canonical nvie GitHub (GH) repository that is inactive. Of nvie's ~1000 >> forks, at least 2 are useful: > > I'd have a similar question for the oxygen-gtk port I've proposed. It exists > for GTk2 and GTk3, and while they have their own versioning scheme/schedule > it could make sense to treat them as subports ... if of course that allows to > install both at the same time. Yes, subports would be the way to go, have oxygen-gtk2 and oxygen-gtk3 ports. Cheers! Frank _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
