On Sep 9, 2014, at 6:28 AM, Alejandro Imass <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Jerry Zhang <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Actually I want to verify the some security property for several softwares 
>> on ubuntu apt package manager, it seems that they are only in apt, not brew 
>> or macport, that’s why I was trying to install apt using macport the other 
>> day, hoping to install them on mac.
> 
> Sometimes package names will not match exactly but almost surely any software 
> available via apt/dpkg is packaged from a more generic source distribution 
> and most likely available in MacPorts if it's a popular package and would not 
> be so hard to port otherwise. I suggest you research what the original 
> project source is (unless of course is a proprietary and closed binary 
> software made for specifically for Ubuntu (e.g. Skype for Linux)). Usually 
> the language is a tell-tale sign of where and how the package could be 
> sourced for MacPorts or simply download the source and compile yourself. 
> 
> Even if the package is not directly in MacPorts, most likely a lot of the 
> dependencies and tools necessary to build it are. Examples are any packages 
> originally developed in C, Java,  Perl, Python, Ruby, etc. In these cases, 
> even though the package itself is not directly in MacPorts, most or all the 
> base tools would so building from source is usually very easy. 

As Alejandro says, just because a piece of software isn't in MacPorts currently 
doesn't mean that it couldn't be in the future. You're welcome to submit a 
request ticket for any software you'd like to see included in MacPorts.

https://guide.macports.org/#project.tickets

vq
_______________________________________________
macports-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

Reply via email to