On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Carlo Tambuatco <oraclmas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Supported or not...this way seemed to work for a majority of my ports and > I was wondering whether nuking all 459 of my ports for the sake of a few > that don't work seems like an inefficient solution. It seems there are > other ways to approach this problem... Indeed, the happy-go-lucky way: hope stuff will work because it looks like it did and then get incomprehensible problems later on. I know you'd really prefer to cut corners, but do you really want to pay for it later on? -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allber...@gmail.com ballb...@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
