> On Oct 23, 2014, at 11:55 PM, Joshua Root <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> On Oct 23, 2014, at 9:42 PM, Brandon Allbery <allbery.b at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 9:37 PM, William H. Magill <magill at mac.com> >>> wrote: >>> What is the equivalent today? MacPorts does not contain a Lynx port which >>> the search command can find. >>> >>> links or elinks, probably. Ports exist for both. There's also w3m and >>> netrik. >>> >>> ("port search browser" also tells me there is indeed a lynx port. What >>> exactly did you use with "port search"?) >> >> Using the search function on the web page: >> >> https://www.macports.org/ports.php?by=category&substr=Lynx >> >> And >> >> https://www.macports.org/ports.php?by=category&substr=lynx >> >> >> T.T.F.N. >> William H. Magill > > You were searching by category (and there is no "lynx" category). > Searching by name works: > > https://www.macports.org/ports.php?by=name&substr=lynx > > - Josh
> On Oct 24, 2014, at 1:56 AM, Lawrence Velázquez <[email protected]> wrote: > You had "Search by" set to "Category". Try it with "Software title": > > https://www.macports.org/ports.php?by=name&substr=lynx > > lynx certainly does exist in MacPorts. I maintain it :) > > vq This must be the only search function on the Internet which returns zero hits! Obviously I simply did not notice that the "search by" entry did not "snap-back" to the default as when you first hit the page, again a unique "feature" on the Internet. One develops bad habits when away from System Administration and hanging out with "users." :) T.T.F.N. William H. Magill # iMac11,3 Core i7 [2.93GHz - 8 GB 1067MHz] OS X 10.10 # Macmini6,1 Intel Core i5 [2.5 Ghz - 4GB 1600MHz] OS X 10.10 OSX Server (now dead) [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
