On Thursday November 27 2014 07:04:08 Jeremy Whiting wrote: Hi,
> because "beneath" imlpies some sort of relationship. I would have said Lol. For me, KDE4/Qt4 is still very much on top ;) > As far as the other question about kdelibs4 in kf5. kf5 has a > kdelibs4support framework that makes it somewhat a two step process to port Ah, that's what caused my confusion. Good to know in any event. > porting an application from kdelibs4/qt4 to kf5/qt5 isn't trivial, but > there are scripts in kde-dev-scripts/kf5 folder to help with most of the > tasks involved. Can it be compared to porting from Python2 to Python3? > Another possible reason to use the word "beneath" is that many applications > that are still using Qt4/kdelibs4 are able to run under plasma 5. I've been I'm hoping that's the case for all applications that do not depend directly on Plasma 4? > using plasma5 for about half a year by now with not too many issues on > linux. I still have kdelibs4 around to run amarok, kmymoney, and a few > other applications that haven't been ported yet. KDE PIM is still KDE4/Qt4, no? Haven't been following that really, not only because even on Linux I'm not ready to make the jump, but also because even KDE PIM 4.14 is so buggy that I went back to PIM 4.13.3 ... R.
_______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
