Hi On 09 Dec 2014, at 11:32, Lawrence Velázquez <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Dec 9, 2014, at 5:29 AM, Lawrence Velázquez <[email protected]> wrote: > >> (Not to mention the semantics of the mapping. Apple's versioning does not >> precisely correspond to LLVM versioning.) > > Perhaps it'd be more accurate to say that Apple's versioning is *more > precise* than the public LLVM versioning, and thus constraints would not map > cleanly. Yes, but remember that the main goal would be to 'accept' Portfiles, not to build things. In that light, the whole blacklisting feature could be a shim on Linux. Surely there's a reason someone maintains a Linux 'port' of MacPorts? > > vq > Sent from my iPhone Oh, you too? :) _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
