On Jan 9, 2015, at 11:38 AM, René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Friday January 09 2015 10:33:56 Lawrence Velázquez wrote: > >>> Unless I'm mistaken and it's the other way round, dragonegg is a gcc >>> front-end to llvm.> >> It's a GCC plugin that swaps out the backend. > > Isn't that another or equivalent way of saying the same (or equivalent) thing? Not really, but the details are not relevant to this conversation. >> To provide a port? Not complicated. To provide working software that doesn't >> have upstream backing? Different story. > > Was I wrong presuming that MacPorts only provides ports that are not known to > be dysfunctional? ^^ We try to avoid distributing dysfunctional ports. Hence, no `dragonegg-3.5-*`. vq _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
