> Le 19 janv. 2015 à 10:34, Ryan Schmidt <ryandes...@macports.org> a écrit :
> 
> Please Reply All so that the discussion stays on the mailing list.

Hmmm, I did.

> Of note is that MacPorts used to not do this, or rather, using these archives 
> used to be optional, and not the default. Previously, the default was that 
> the contents of /opt/local/var/macports/software was the actual software 
> being installed. Hard links would then be created in the "real" locations. 
> This did not waste disk space, however various new features of OS X 
> interacted badly with this, including Spotlight as of OS X v10.4 and Time 
> Machine as of OS X v10.5, so we were forced to remove the previous mode of 
> operation and insist on using archives instead.

OK.

So maybe we could reconsider the existence of this feature, or at least,
the fact that its mandatory.

> I am not familiar with what other package management systems do.

Well, apt-get and the rest have no such equivalent.  They just deploy
the software, period.  They don't keep a copy at hand, just in case.
And yes, there's no acivate/deactivate (that I know of).
_______________________________________________
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

Reply via email to