On Thursday May 28 2015 16:34:47 Lawrence Velázquez wrote: > > It should be safe to build ports that do not depend directly on a failed > > port, but it seems not impossible that the ABI-changing effect of the > > update of an indirect dependency permeates to a direct dependency. > > I would consider this a bug in the dependent port. That indirect dependency > should be a direct dependency.
At least it seems a good guideline: if dependency A changed its ABI because it's dependency B changed ABI, B should become a direct dependency. It's hard to do something like that prophylactically, sadly :) R. _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
