On May 29, 2015, at 8:52 AM, Rainer Müller <[email protected]> wrote:

> Even if this CloudFlare patch offers any performance improvements, the
> authors did not bother to implement it the sane way respecting licenses
> for further distribution. In this form, it will never be included
> upstream and we should not do it either.

+1

> The Intel patch looks better, applying zlib license to the files added.
> Also it has a check for availability of the SSE 4.2 feature before
> execution of the machine instruction.
> 
> Unfortunately, I couldn't find any zlib mailing list archive containing
> the discussion of including the Intel patches.

https://web.archive.org/web/20131201003911/http://mail.madler.net/pipermail/zlib-devel_madler.net/2013-November/thread.html

vq
_______________________________________________
macports-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

Reply via email to