> On 19 Aug 2015, at 5:49 pm, "semaphor...@yahoo.com" <semaphor...@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > It's not just a matter of compiling, but compilation TIME. It takes > significantly longer than it would on 10.10. On the other hand, my test is > done on a hardware machine, not a VM one, so I guess it's just another case > of "it (doesn't) work on my machine.
Something is indeed up with your machine i would say. Compilation times in my vm compare very favourable to those in the host machine, running 10.10. > > Enviado desde mi iPhone > >> El 2015-08-19, a las 11:53, Dominik Reichardt <domi...@gmail.com> escribió: >> >> >> >>> Am 19.08.2015 um 17:18 schrieb Chris Jones <jon...@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk>: >>> >>> >>> >>>>> On 19/08/15 16:13, C.T. wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Experience: 10.11 is still in beta, and it shows. With XCode beta, expect >>>>> HOURS of compilations for a mere update, and many manual operations since >>>>> MacPorts doesn’t yet recognizes El Capitan >>> >>> I disagree on two of the three points. >>> >>> Yes, you should expect to compile all ports as there are no binary archives >>> as of yet. >>> >>> However, as long as you have the correct Xcode installed (the latest beta) >>> and have installed MacPorts from source, it works just as smoothly in a VM >>> where I am testing it as in the host OSX10.10 machine. >>> >>> Yes its beta, but I've not had any significant issues in the limited >>> playing I have done in the VM ... >>> >>> Chris >> >> Thanks, >> yes, I know it is beta - that doesn't put me off very much, I've used >> previous betas since 10.7, so I know what to expect. Mostly at this stage it >> was ok. >> Whether I migrate during the beta and compile everything or later with the >> finished system, doesn't matter much to me anyway. Since I tend to need >> +universal or some other variant, I need to compile most ports instead of >> just getting the binaries. Also I'm not using that many ports, Gimp is the >> one with the biggest dependencies... >> >> So, seems like I'll backup and jump... >> >> Thanks again >> >> >> >>>>> >>>>>> El 19 ago 2015, a las 4:41, Dominik Reichardt <domi...@gmail.com> >>>>>> escribió: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I’m itching to switch but often need MacPorts. Do any of you have >>>>>> experience yet with it *AND* MacPorts? >>>>>> >>>>>> In previous switches, I switched by using the development version of >>>>>> MacPorts and following the migration steps of any major OS X upgrade, >>>>>> still the way to go? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Take care >>>>>> >>>>>> Dom >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> macports-users mailing list >>>>>> macports-users@lists.macosforge.org >>>>>> https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> macports-users mailing list >>>> macports-users@lists.macosforge.org >>>> https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users >>> _______________________________________________ >>> macports-users mailing list >>> macports-users@lists.macosforge.org >>> https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users >> _______________________________________________ >> macports-users mailing list >> macports-users@lists.macosforge.org >> https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users > _______________________________________________ > macports-users mailing list > macports-users@lists.macosforge.org > https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
