On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 3:39 PM, René J.V. <rjvber...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I understand that libressl aims to be API-compatible with openssl so that > it can act as a drop-in replacement. How far does that go, far enough that > one can symlink the libssl and libcrypto runtimes from the one port to the > shared libraries of the other, without having to rebuild dependents? My understanding is that the API (i.e. source) compatibility is mostly there but the A*B*I (binary) compatibility was a swing and a miss; assume you have to rebuild stuff. -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allber...@gmail.com ballb...@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
