On Tuesday November 10 2015 09:21:19 Daniel J. Luke wrote: >Other ports would all depend on ‘mp-ssl-lib’ and not directly only openssl or >libressl. > >It’s not a perfect solution, but may be nicer than adding +openssl/+libressl >to every possible port.
Hmmm, I should have thought of that. Wait, I actually did but with one step further (providing a compatibility library that would be the one applications actually link against ... and that 's also why I kept the thought to myself :)) Anyway, I guess I have the answer to the ABI compatibility question: https://github.com/libressl-portable/portable (if that's the same thing as libressl tout court) https://blog.flameeyes.eu/2014/07/libressl-drop-in-and-abi-leakage#gsc.tab=0 R. _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
