> On May 19, 2016, at 9:11 AM, René J.V. Bertin <rjvber...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thursday May 19 2016 08:13:26 Ryan Schmidt wrote: >>> Skipping those components gives me a destroot directory that is 185Mb big, >>> as opposed to the 359Mb from the binary package for 10.9 . I must add that >>> I build with optflags="-Os -march=core2", though; -Os overriding GCC's >>> default -O2 may have made some difference too. >> >> So we don't know how much each of those modifications contributed to the >> space difference. > > No, but Os vs O2 shouldn't lead to a 2x space reduction. > > >> You can't have two ports install files to the same locations without >> conflicting with one another. And having two ports install the same files is >> redundant and counterproductive. > > That's not relevant here: we're talking about variants of a single port.
We can't use variants for reasons already explained. You talked about using path:-style dependencies, which one only does if there are multiple ports that can provide a file. _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
