On Aug 11, 2016, at 09:55 , Lawrence Velázquez <lar...@macports.org> wrote:
>> On Aug 11, 2016, at 9:05 AM, Jean-François Caron <jfca...@phas.ubc.ca> wrote: >> >> I’m glad my idea wasn’t as silly as I had thought. Maybe this will go >> somewhere. >> >> I needed to build clang locally because I use the +analyzer variant. Maybe >> this variant could be made default, since it has no performance impacts and >> shouldn’t cause any problems for users who ignore the analyzer. There are >> probably more people who currently do +analyzer than people who would insist >> on -analyzer if it were default. > > The +analyzer variant is already enabled by default. Which clang port are you > building, and on what OS? > > vq This was for a regular “port upgrade outdated” of clang-3.6 @3.6.2_3+analyzer to clang-3.6 @3.6.2_4+analyzer. I am on OSX 10.9.5. Maybe it’s too old. Jean-François _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
