> On Oct 15, 2016, at 07:58, Davide Liessi <davide.lie...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2016-10-14 2:00 GMT+02:00 Ryan Schmidt <ryandes...@macports.org>: >> For some reason the 10.6 x86_64 builder didn't build it either so we didn't >> have a gcc6-6.2.0_0.darwin_10.x86_64.tbz2 package. It's not easy to find old >> buildbot logs so I don't know if it failed because of the same bootstrap >> failure you saw or for some other reason. >> >> Josh forced a build now, and it built successfully, so if you clean and try >> again, without the universal variant, you'll get the package from us without >> having to compile it yourself. > > It happened again for gcc6 @6.2.0_1. > https://build.macports.org/builders/ports-10.6_x86_64_legacy-builder/builds/7398
I forced another build and it succeeded: https://build.macports.org/builders/ports-10.6_x86_64_legacy-builder/builds/7437 Does anybody want to compare the logs and try to figure out what's different?
_______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
