Hi Chris, thanks for your reply.
> On 5 Jan 2017, at 16:08, Chris Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > Presumably the first machine, that creates the local binaries runs just fine, > but then the second doesn't use these for this one port, and attempts to > build again from source ? If correct, is this really a problem ? From the > discussion in the ticket this is exactly what is wanted for this port, as it > compiles very specifically for the machine it is to be used on. You *want* it > to therefore build from source on each and every machine. Yes, that indeed is not ideal, but probably necessary for this port. I don’t object to this. The point is that after doing that, macports has “forgotten” about my local source for all further ports to upgrade and falls back to the default macports source. It’s not a big issue indeed (as cancelling and restarting the port upgrade outdated fixes it), but it might be a symptom of a bug, which I don’t have the energy to track down. Unfortunately, after I noticed this behaviour (not using my private archive site as first instance), I aborted the operation, before I got to a port where binaries are not available from macports. So I don’t know if it just got the priorities wrong (using default macports binaries before local archive), or had forgotten about my archive sites completely. Sorry for not making this clearer initially, I hope you see my point now. Peter > > Chris > > On 05/01/17 14:23, Peter Brommer wrote: >> Hi, >> >> it appears that gmp @6.1.2_0 breaks my macports setup, due to its use of >> “archive_sites” in the Portfile (to avoid installing from precompiled >> binaries). >> >> I have two Macs, and I use the setup described in >> https://trac.macports.org/wiki/howto/ShareArchives2 - one machine creates >> the local binaries not available from macports, the other one uses them via >> a customised archive_sites.conf. >> >> gmp (and maybe other ports) unsets archive_sites to avoid installing from >> binaries (as discussed in https://trac.macports.org/ticket/41614), so it >> ignores my custom archive_site (aside: in principle, it should fail as I >> request binary-only with port -b upgrade, but if I read >> https://trac.macports.org/ticket/50885 correctly that will be addressed in a >> future macports release). However, after building, installing and activating >> gmp, macports no longer used my local archive_site, but falls back to the >> default archive_sites. >> >> I’m not sure if this is a bug, and I have a hard time reproducing it, as the >> second time I run the command, gmp is already upgraded, and it keeps using >> my local archive_site. Should I still file this as a bug? And against what? >> >> Cheers, >> >> Peter >>
