Thanks - that's what I wanted. Those don't appear to be Kerberized, unlike the ones in Sierra (AFAIK); but for me, that's not a problem.
> On Nov 28, 2017, at 14:45, Marius Schamschula <[email protected]> wrote: > > Richard, > > This has come up on several occasions. > > You are looking for the inetutils port. Under High Sierra it installs the > missing server and client utilities. > >> On Nov 28, 2017, at 1:32 PM, Richard L. Hamilton <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> I can see ditching the telnet server, but the client remains useful for >> debugging various protocols, and in rare cases of accessing ancient systems >> (or emulations of them) which don't support ssh. >> >> Likewise, there remain times a command-line ftp client is useful. >> >> I see some of what look like command-line ftp client(s) in MacPorts. Is >> there a particular one people would recommend as the least surprising >> replacement for the removed ftp client? In particular, similar interface >> and features (IPv6 a must). I installed both cmdftp and pftp, and neither >> really has a very similar interface. >> >> But I don't see a command-line telnet client at all (not counting whatever >> might be part of putty). IMO, that absence will be noticed. :-) >> >> What I'd kind of like is replacements built on source code of the closest >> lineage to what Apple used, but still being maintained. I see the telnet >> client still in their remote_cmds tar bundle, but I have no idea how to >> build bits of Darwin without trying to build the whole dang thing (as I >> recall, libtelnet/encrypt.h or something like that wasn't found, for >> example), which is way beyond the scope of what I'd care to attempt. >> >> (yes, I know they dropped the r-commands even earlier; that's >> understandable, but telnet and ftp remain useful) >> >> > > > Marius > -- > Marius Schamschula > > >
