On 31 January 2018 at 02:57, Ken Cunningham wrote: > On 2018-01-30, at 5:41 PM, Joshua Root wrote: >> Ken Cunningham wrote: >>> On 2018-01-30, at 9:44 AM, Riccardo Mottola via macports-users wrote: >>>> before filing a bug, maybe this is expected and there is a stragey for >>>> updating it or replacing it with something? >>>> This is on 10.6 Snow Leopard, btw. >>> >>> The message is correct. This is expected. >>> >>> It's been rolled into libcxx. >> >> Why isn't it replaced_by libcxx then? >> >> - Josh > > I will admit I wondered that as well. > > What is the proper message when two ports are combined into one ( ie libcxx > and libcxxabi become libcxx)?
I imagine that replaced_by should simply work out of the box without any special message. Mojca
