On 2018-9-10 13:23 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: > It is fine for ports to offer different versions to different platforms. Up > to now, a "platform" was the combination of an operating system name, major > version number, and architecture (PowerPC or Intel). It has been proposed > that the C++ standard library should be added to that definition. Code > implementing that has already been added to portindex. We have not yet > deployed changes to the server to generate separate indexes per C++ standard > library, and we have not modified MacPorts base to look for a different index > on the server depending on the C++ standard library. We should make both of > those changes.
Oh sure, you can multiply the number of portindexes easily enough to reflect one more configuration choice. It's not a sustainable design direction though.
