thanks for testing.

I have rolled most of that into the gnutls portfile with Marius’ blessing, so 
hopefully it will be automatic for folks.

Best,

Ken




> On Jan 19, 2019, at 11:02 AM, Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Ken,
> 
> 
> 
> I had finally some time to test your suggestions, below my feedback.
> 
> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> libs/libcrypto.a |  | /usr/bin/sed 's/.* //' | sort | uniq > 
>>> .libs/libgnutls.exp
>>> ../libtool: eval: line 1731: syntax error near unexpected token `|'
>> 
>> 
>> this occurs because the version of nm used to process the objects from the 
>> compiler is not new enough
>> configure.env-append NM=${prefix}/bin/nm
>> configure.env-append lt_cv_path_NM=${prefix}/bin/nm
>> 
> 
> My tests show that the latter helps. I changed my portfile to:
> 
> configure.args  --disable-guile \
>                 --disable-silent-rules \
>                 --disable-libdane \
>                 --disable-doc \
>                 --enable-local-libopts \
>                 --enable-openssl-compatibility \
>                 --with-p11-kit \
>                 
> --with-system-priority-file="${prefix}/etc/gnutls/default-priorities" \
>                 --with-default-trust-store-pkcs11=pkcs11: \
>                 ac_cv_prog_AWK=/usr/bin/awk \
>                 lt_cv_path_NM=${prefix}/bin/nm
> 
> 
>> 
>> I just added a combination of the above to the `gnutls` portfile, and 
>> success:
>> 
>> $ port -v installed gnutls
>> The following ports are currently installed:
>>   gnutls @3.6.5_1+doc (active) platform='darwin 9' archs='i386' 
>> date='2019-01-10T22:53:28-0800
> Koreander:~ multix$ port -v installed gnutls 
> The following ports are currently installed:
>   gnutls @3.5.19_1+doc platform='darwin 9' archs='i386' 
> date='2018-11-16T01:58:08+0100'
>   gnutls @3.6.5_1+doc (active) platform='darwin 9' archs='i386' 
> date='2019-01-19T15:05:53+0100'
> 
> 
> 
> looks cool, doesn't it?
> 
> 
> 
> I had to build this way of course:
> 
> port -v upgrade gnutls configure.compiler=macports-clang-5.0
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Riccardo
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to