> On Sep 27, 2019, at 11:15 PM, Ryan Schmidt <ryandes...@macports.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Sep 27, 2019, at 06:04, Carlo Tambuatco wrote:
> 
>> I filed a ticket on this issue already and included a logfile for it, but I 
>> thought there's no harm in asking the mailing list for a quick solution...
>> 
>> I upgraded to macports 2.6.0 today. During a routine upgrade of my 
>> ports, the py36-pyqt5 port failed to configure, possibly due to a 
>> problem with the recent XCode 11 upgrade...?
>> 
>> From logfile:
>> 
>> Error: Failed to determine the detail of your Qt installation. Try again 
>> using
>> the --verbose flag to see more detail about the problem.
>> Querying qmake about your Qt installation...
>> Determining the details of your Qt installation...
>> /opt/local/libexec/qt5/bin/qmake -o cfgtest_QtCore.mk cfgtest_QtCore.pro
>> Project ERROR: Could not resolve SDK Path for 'macosx10.14' using 
>> --show-sdk-path
>> 
>> 
>> This is the first time something like this has happened. No problems before 
>> the XCode 11 upgrade.
>> 
>> I upgraded to XCode 11 a few days ago, and as someone else pointed out, 
>> XCode removed the MacOS10.14.sdk and replaced it with MacOS10.15.sdk. 
>> What I did to try and resolve it was create a MacOSX10.14.sdk symlink. 
>> Is py36-pyqt5 one of those ports that has a hard-coded path to the 10.14 
>> SDK, and somehow isn't fooled by the symlink I created or something?
> 
> We are discovering, due to the Xcode 11 upgrade, just how many places in 
> MacPorts the path to the 10.14 SDK got baked into files where we didn't mean 
> for it to be. There are many other mailing list threads and tickets being 
> filed with us about this. Until this is all ironed out, your simplest course 
> of action would be to uninstall Xcode 11 and reinstall Xcode 10.
> 

Will there be a notification or something when this is all ironed out?

> I cannot advocate creating a MacOSX10.14.sdk symlink. The 10.14 and 10.15 SDK 
> are not the same thing. Subverting the system into believing they are can 
> only cause you problems down the road.
> 

Reply via email to