Maybe I’m missing something obvious here, but why isn’t the list configured IAW RFC 2369 instead?
Sent from my iPad -Al- > On Oct 28, 2019, at 19:44, Ryan Schmidt <ryandes...@macports.org> wrote: > > > >> On Oct 12, 2019, at 21:50, Al Varnell wrote: >> >> I feel certain that could be configured to be the default setting for this >> list. It is the only one of over a dozen that I subscribe to where it’s not. >> >> Could that be checked into? > > No. Munging the Reply-To header would contravene the relevant RFC. > > http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-still-harmful.html > > > And please use our new list addresses at lists.macports.org, rather than the > old addresses at the old hostname which were deprecated at the end of 2016. > Although mail to the old addresses forwards to the new ones, users using > restrictive mail servers like Yahoo! cannot receive those forwards. >