On 28.11.19 12:44 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Nov 28, 2019, at 04:48, joerg van den hoff wrote:
I ran `port upgrade outdated' today. after end of sucessfull completion
`port outdated' still reported
ghostscript 9.27_1 < 9.50_0
rerunning the `upgrade' did not change anything. on further inspection I see
that I now have
1) ghostscript @9.25_1+x11
2) ghostscript @9.26_0+x11
3) ghostscript @9.27_1+x11 (active)
4) ghostscript @9.50_0+x11
question1: why does this happen? should not the `upgrade' take care of
deactivating/activating automaticall? it usually does...
Yes of course. But it is possible for the activate phase of a port to fail. I
think that should leave you with *no* version active, rather than the old
version active. It is also possible for the user to reactivate old versions,
though I suppose you would know if you had done this.
I don't think that has happened. if so, it would have to be too long ago to remember. so is that a
potential bug in `ports' logic?
question2: `deactivate ghostscript' warns me (not quite unexpectedly) that
multiple ports will break. how to proceed? force activation of ghostscript and
rerun `upgrade'?
No need to force anything. Just run:
sudo port activate ghostscript @9.50_0+x11
too obvious, so it didnt' come to my mind;). thanks.
P.S: Please use our new list addresses at lists.macports.org, not the old
addresses that were deprecated in late 2016.
sorry for this mistake. have sanitized my address book now. should not happen
again...
